((A.D.D.)) ~ ((Attention Disorientation Disorder))

Näthan:

Welcome to breaking the trance source cast, episode 4, ADD, attention disorientation disorder.

Ashok:

So, Näthan, there's so much going on in the, in the surrounding culture. But repeatedly, it has to do with consciousness, attention, having our minds hacked. And, this is our 4th episode of just you and I having heart to heart, exchange dialogues and others everyone is, welcome back in to join us in this deep urgent medical moment, where we're trying to show there's something life and death going on. And that's where attention when when there's a, not that they have a panic, you know, reaction, but when people see clearly we're in danger, survival has always found a way to get people to survive. And now what we've been showing in the last, 3 episodes about the media and attention and consciousness and source, media, source cast.

Ashok:

There's a source cast because we're seeking to bring it bring out of media, the missing media, not here, but here. And it it it when people realize, wow, if if there is a danger zone here that we didn't see before, but now with the hologram, the code you can say, I didn't realize that our attention, where we put our attention or where we don't put it because it's grabbed and taken over and sabotage and trollers and grifters and hackers grabbing and him rigging our minds and our lives to give you living a rigged life without even knowing it because you never got basic education about the thinker and the information and what is my relationship to the information and am I is I'm not being grabbed by something I don't even understand. That's causing great devastation and is not even life threatening. And so when we're fixated on the information that can grab our attention, how about our mindful attention media in the source media? If this is where we're gonna come to life and this is deadly and this is lively.

Ashok:

Right? Well, that's gonna that's gonna attract our attention and break break the trans. So breaking the trans means we're cap we're captured, and we don't know it. So what we're seeking to do in in our medical, you know, narrative is expose with the code that were that were conflated all in one space. There was code chaos.

Ashok:

And we know in politics now, if someone can, or or or can can create chaos in the public space, then you can't focus. And if you can't focus, your ten your attention is taken. And once you're captured and your attention is hacked, your will is hacked. If your will your life is hacked. And and and if you see the devastating consequences of being, lodged in a a mental operating software that we didn't see before, but now we're seeing it and we're seeing, damn, look at the consequences of that for my life.

Ashok:

Then that medical emergency can grab our attention and call us. They don't just grab our attention. We want to become mindful, you know, to to to to wake up, to be mindful. So so that's the thing you've been talking about. So I want to I'll toss it to you and see what your thoughts are about where we are now in terms of the attention, disorder.

Ashok:

Attention attention is a disorder. And if we're not mindful, is attention deficit, you know, incompetence disorder.

Näthan:

Mhmm.

Ashok:

Right? So attention, are we competent or incompetent? Are we critical thinkers? Are we gullible and captured, or are we free? This is huge enough.

Ashok:

Mhmm. And I wanna just invite you to some just jumping off. I know jumping right in. You know, in our heart to heart. What do you think?

Näthan:

That's what

Näthan:

I love. Just jumping right in, especially, with our our time constraints. So We're

Ashok:

gonna have remember, we don't go for more than half an hour. Yeah. I I hope everyone knows everyone is welcome. Everyone is welcome to join us. You know, this is this is life and death for the human family.

Ashok:

Keep going.

Näthan:

Yeah. Yeah. Well, I mean, you you already said it all, really. We can just call it call it a

Ashok:

Alright. We can say by everybody.

Näthan:

You know, but, you know, I was thinking while you were talking, I was thinking about how I used to be in my younger years before I got kind of lens activity and and started to understand, you know, where I was operating from. And, I wouldn't necessarily call myself a dyed in the wool conspiracy theorist or anything like that, but, man, did I I was thinking about how my mind would just so somebody would just have to say something that was tantalizing enough to grip my attention. Let's say, vaccines are bad. Just picking a simple example. I used to be, I guess you could say I was kind of an anti vaxxer there for a minute.

Näthan:

And it wasn't because of the evidence. It wasn't because of anything like that. It was because the idea that the government is gonna try to get inside your body and and, you know, because that's their ultimate goal is that they're evil and they just wanna dumb us down, blah blah blah, that kind of thing. You know, in in my earlier days that that was such a tantalizing narrative that did not I didn't pause a second and say, okay, now wait a second. You know?

Näthan:

And let's look let's like step back and like really look at this. It was just it grabbed me. I'm was giving one example. Many examples like this, you know, where a theory was presented and I just didn't realize I I do now in hindsight, in retrospect, I look, wow, man. I was really gullible.

Näthan:

I was just, like and I didn't realize I was being gullible, of course, because good gullibility is kind of not self aware. But as time passed and I was able to step back and just see things from a more critical intelligence and lens, which I had to develop over time, I had to develop the capacity to be immune to having my attention grabbed automatically like it was. Yeah. And so I've experienced the very thing that you're talking about, over the course of the last, I would say, about 25 years, and, and and really see a major shift in that time in terms of my ability to command my attention, and not just have it be hijacked or hacked by whatever's coming at me or whoever's coming at me. It was a time where anybody who said anything with conviction or confidence, I just kinda believed them.

Näthan:

It's embarrassing to admit it now, but, you know, it was just so I didn't have that ability. And so what we're talking that's sort of a micro example, but it captures a lot of what's going on in terms of the human consciousness. I mean, we think about very important things that are determining the future of all of our lives. And in the case of the United States of America being such a force on the planet, really, the the the elections that we just had is something that's determining the fate of the entire planet. And and, and how are people voting?

Näthan:

This is kind of getting maybe jumping ahead an episode or 2, but, you know, I was thinking about how how many people were voting competently. How many people are participating in a competent, grounded, critical thinking, aware sort of way, and how many of us are operating. And voting is just one example. It could be any any choice that you're making throughout your day from micro to macro, and every micro choice has a macro effect and vice versa, you know, how much is our our our our choices well informed in the double bracket sense? How many of them are are actually not just, excuse me, deterministic, based on how we were programmed or how we, you know, just what what kind of prejudices and ideas that we uncritically absorbed as now this is my world view and this is my lens.

Näthan:

We don't even think of it as having a lens. We just go, what I see is what's real. How many people are stepping back and going, wait, how am I using my attention? And without doing that, that's the attention incompetence disorder Because this kind of attention, single bracket attention, myopic attention, attention that is not you're not paying attention to your attention. It's taking that critical step back, then that that is that is the disorder.

Näthan:

To be to have kind of not even gotten to the very first stage of recognizing that you're interpreting and that you're that you have a lens, and to have to even have the to raise the question. Okay. This is what I think I see, but am I seeing it clearly? And how do I step back? You know, I don't know a lot of people who are asking these questions.

Näthan:

A lot of the people I see, whether it's in the media or in the community or whatever, it's just saying things so matter of factly without any of that critical kind of stepping back awareness. And you can kinda hear it in the tone of voice and and once you get that lensativity, you can kinda hear when somebody doesn't have lensativity. Let's put it that way. So when you start to work on having paying attention to your attention, that opens up a whole new level of critical awareness and intelligence. And and I think, honestly, life doesn't start until you do that.

Ashok:

Wow. Freedom doesn't

Näthan:

until you do that.

Ashok:

This is huge. I'd like to really talk about it. I'd like to just draw out some of what you're saying. Because in terms of the public space, people are not educated to know that when you say that here's the information space on the screen of where we are where. That's what this that's it.

Ashok:

Almost like that's where we're seeing everything, our information. It's coming at us. Here we are. The question of our lens, what does that mean? Is we didn't stop to realize that what I'm reading, I'm reading the data coming at me.

Ashok:

And if it's coming at me with very forceful you need to grab my attention or if it's, like, negative attention or or it doesn't matter if it's true or false. And what the information here is being interpreted by us. That's one point. And when you interpret it, let's say the will. This is huge.

Ashok:

The will. I'm using my vote, my rational power, my reason. I know it's small, but my will to say yes or no on the content. And if it comes at me so strong, I don't know that I'm submerged in the space that is prejudicing my mind and cutting me off from a deeper way to be a human here and deeper rational state in the logos, in the fundamental field that all our great first narratives trying to get to what's first to understand the scriptures, wisdom, enlightenment, say we've got to move from here to there. And to do that, you have to come out of the space and see see how your mind did.

Ashok:

Mind your mind did. If not, you're hacked. If you're hacked by the code. It's got you. And all you do in your life, you're living your life based upon how you're interpreting.

Ashok:

What do you mean I'm reading it? Here's the data coming at me, right, in the media, in life, nature, experience. It's all going on here. So we're this is up to space that we're seeing. How do how do we do with that where they can grab my attention, my will?

Ashok:

Right? And I can say, yeah, I can consent to it, to the information. And that's what be a a a narrative, a theory, a narrative, an ideology that's being presented in media around a vast diversity of of of different narratives coming at us in the chaos and everyday life in the space of consciousness, and you can grab it and be so chaotic. We don't know what's true or false.

Näthan:

And that can happen internally too, not just what's coming at us from outside, but even what's playing inside our own mind, what we're paying attention to within our own consciousness. So it's not just

Ashok:

Well, yes. Because it's not let me you know, if this is the place of information and it comes at me, my own inner life is being processed there too. That's right. Thirsty. I hate you.

Ashok:

I I'd like this. I'm gonna vote for this. I want this. All of that. All that psychic experience is being interpreted in the information space too.

Näthan:

Mhmm.

Ashok:

So I I can oh, okay. You're right. Just say it's external or internal. It's still being processed on the screen. We don't really what do you mean by the lens?

Ashok:

I can have a biblical, narrative I'm subscribing to as a person in a Jewish Christian. For example, that's the lens. I'm seeing my story here, and I say yes to Jesus or yes to Moses. Right? Or no to whatever it is.

Ashok:

I can see yes or no to the story. The God God the God story narrative can be here. And I can say yes to it. Here's my what is the belief? It's when you use your will to vote yes and embrace a narrative and say, this is my truth.

Ashok:

This is my worldview. This is my story. I've this is true. And I can have science science lens, a physics lens, a big band lens, and a big back narrative that I subscribe to with my community of scientific, friends in that community together. We conspire together to agree that this is the truth.

Ashok:

So how do you use your will if your will is laboring under a software that we don't realize that we're our relationship with our wills and our judgment and our beliefs saying yes or no to information and it's coming at us, then it can grab us. It can be shocking news. It can be, it can be shot at almost a reptilian level before we even have a chance to think about it or know it or appraise it or evaluate it. Mhmm. I heard you say all of that.

Ashok:

So the critical human is one who is paying attention. All the great wisdom says mind your minding. What do you mean? Pay attention to the software that's shaping all your life and the public media, you know, and media space. And now we're seeing it's flooded in such a way that who knows what's true.

Ashok:

It depends on your perspective. What lens are you with? What story are you describing? You got your story. I got mine.

Ashok:

Your story is is your meaning. My story is my meaning, and my truth is not your truth. And so it's relative to the individual of mine. Truth is relative to what you believe and using. And when you vote, when you vote, you're using your will.

Ashok:

I vote for so. And if we're not minding our mind, we're gullible. And and and we're not being a critical rational being in freedom of the will. So is is our will captured and hacked? Are we self consensual, self hacking to a code that we never critically stood back to so deep?

Ashok:

The software that's governing our lives that we're born into all our lives and all the people are living in this in the the software. And we and the great teachers sit back up and take it pay attention. Mind your minding. What's that? Mindfulness.

Ashok:

So mindfulness is the the vote to become a mindful human being, a critical thinker, going to source science, deep science, truth. Is USA is USA here or here? Am I here or here? So what you said and what we were saying in the last 3 episodes, the 4th one we're talking about our tension can be a disorder. Attention itself is a deficit, and it's mass distraction.

Ashok:

By what? By what shapes the mass consciousness, which is what the software, our culture making and self making interpretation is to technology. It's software. It's what shows up towards it laboring under the software that we're all born into. And you can pay attention to, you know, you know, just to to just a metaphor paying attention.

Ashok:

Sounds like a marketing.

Näthan:

Yeah.

Ashok:

Right? I can buy attention. I'm hacking.

Näthan:

You know

Ashok:

what I mean? What is your attention worth? Because attention your attention is yours. It's your life. It's your greatest resource.

Ashok:

Where are you placing your mind? And do you know you'll have a choice with your will to use play this game of the everyday common sense culture, the mass culture, media, or go, we're trying to bring source media. What's the source? Going to the into the deeper space of logos, rational space, the lights of reason. Mhmm.

Ashok:

We hold these truths to be self evident, life, liberty, well-being. And one of the things coming out all around in the panic now about your media and being hacked, and and are are we free? If if we are hacked, forget about the machines or voting machines, then we are the voting machines that are already hacked. If you can command them, then you're you already got the vote.

Näthan:

Yeah.

Ashok:

So this life could be rigged. My life could be rigged by consensual immersion within a software that we never listen to the great teachings and critical thinking of rational remind you of binding and become a mindful human being. Freedom. The land this is the land of the free. Mhmm.

Ashok:

That's yeah. So so what I hear in the news now, and I like you to respond to this, people say, this is so powerful when something grabs your attention. That's attention deficit. When you're not you're gullible. You can be hacked.

Ashok:

Mhmm. And you can hack yourself.

Näthan:

Credulous. Yeah.

Ashok:

You're credulous. Credulity is believer. Someone speaks with authority and affirming. It doesn't matter true or false. It doesn't matter anymore.

Ashok:

It's how forceful is it coming at you, the information. And if it's disinformation hitting you, it can just dominate your will and your attention. It can command and commandeer your attention.

Näthan:

Mhmm.

Ashok:

And then you're hacked. Right?

Näthan:

And you

Ashok:

could be happy for life. This is tragic. And furthermore, when we see the great, first narratives of wisdom and enlightenment say, this is a medical emergency, people. Being cut off from the source of being is is a danger zone. It's like a cultural Titanic.

Ashok:

It's as if this is almost like a boat that's that's in trouble. I mean, I'm doing this to kind of suggest a vessel.

Näthan:

I see it.

Ashok:

You know, maybe this if what do you see? You have to panic. Do you realize that where we are deforming ourselves? We're not well formed. We're not awakened rational persons, humans, free beings.

Ashok:

Yet we're really held captive. That would be an alarming thing to discover. And if we're raising our children's objects and ourselves as objects, the subject here who is raising us using objectifying all the information. I'm reliving this information space, this version of information. Think of the word in formation.

Ashok:

What is this? This is fundamental form. Yahweh, Allah, Brahman, form. Ethics, form. I mean, if you hear, you're deform and disform and uninformed.

Ashok:

So to be well formed, to be a well formed human being, a person, a free being, you've gotta really pass this off what with your will. You realize your will is not only immersed here. That's why this hologram is so revealing because it says, even though we're here, this is holding us. The fundamental field of being is making this possible to work.

Näthan:

Can you put the I would you write the I write the the the I in the double brackets or I m or whatever you wanna do it? I just wanna see that up there at top for for contrast sake. Yeah. Yeah. So Here's I.

Ashok:

So here's the way you're gonna be here or here. Wow. This is the rest of what I'm trying to say. Your higher self is with you already. This is always here holding this.

Ashok:

So the journey from here I to I am is just a step back from the software that's holding you.

Näthan:

And that's breaking the trance. That's the essence

Ashok:

of breaking the trans. That's exactly right. Right?

Näthan:

To get out of the malware.

Ashok:

That's what it is.

Näthan:

To see it. Yeah.

Ashok:

To see that is a woah. So you're already I am. Your your high self is with you already.

Näthan:

Mhmm.

Ashok:

The source is right with you. And our source cast is attempting to bring to life this hologram to to sound the alarm in the sense, not been with the whistleblowers with the great teachers and scriptures and all say, check this out. This is not good. We're suffering. We're broken.

Ashok:

We're fragmented. We're polarized. We can't be we the people. We've got to become critical. We've got our awakened conscience, which are not in here, but to change a code and a software and come into a deeper space, enter the zone of I and thou sacred space.

Ashok:

This is unsacred. This is sacred.

Näthan:

Yeah.

Ashok:

Pretty rational. This is rational.

Näthan:

Mhmm.

Ashok:

This is free citizen, and this is citizenship. Why? Because a person is a a logos savior. Living in the light of logos is a critical rational being. If we see that if if if we if we can help the public see the whole ground for the first time, as living before, he says, damn, this is not good.

Ashok:

That is going to be a mass attraction. Mhmm.

Näthan:

Yeah. And to understand that you can be in that that that lower space and be a good person. It's not a it's it's not it's not, like, a put down to say that that's where the the community of of of humans right now are largely in just that space. It's not a put down. It what it's more like a like a doctor saying to to the the patient, like, okay.

Näthan:

You've got this you've got this illness of whatever kind. You know, it's not a put down saying, look. If we're gonna get better, we gotta see the illness. We gotta see that. You can have the best intentions inside of that that that lower space

Ashok:

of Best intention. Yeah.

Näthan:

Disinformation where the attention is hijacked and hacked, and we can try all of our activism and all of the things we're trying to do to make things better, be it on the personal level or on the global level. It's it's, it it we're swimming upstream, you know? It's like it's like trying to trying to, like, stop the Titanic from sinking by just keep on using buckets to get the water out of the boat, you know, and not and not being able to keep up. We're not able to do it in that space because we need to activate that deeper level of of will power and consciousness power that's outside of the trans space if we're going to if we're going to really make things better. So even our best intentions are getting getting, just, flushed down the toilet, so to speak.

Näthan:

You know?

Ashok:

Because the words all this vocabulary is in here. What does intention? Attention is what I focus upon. Right? Single bracket focus.

Ashok:

But what is my intention? My will. I intend to open the door. I intend to lose weight. I intend to vote.

Ashok:

I intend to, you know, see my lover. I intend it's a thought that I'm saying I intend. You intend a piece of information. Right? But when you're intending here and attending to source first, That that source being reality source, sacred ground is holding you, that you couldn't be without it.

Ashok:

That intentionality is a free will. So the will here is free. That's the vote. You can vote here. The will here is not a free will.

Ashok:

So ethics is when we say, wow. Am I laboring in my whole life in a matrix, a code, a grammar, a logic, software, whatever name that's running the show and running my mind and my attention, it's grabbed us, and we're all on the way hacked by this. Right? And, to you, the biblical language is we're born in sin. What is sin?

Ashok:

A software that puts us first and not see what's first first, and hence we're cut off from connection to the source. And we need to not convert but invert to go this first to source first. And that's really what we're trying to do with the source our source cast.

Näthan:

Mhmm. And that's a prerequisite that's a prerequisite for any processing of any information in any form of any kind. Because if we again, if we don't address this first, we're not truly critically aware in the deep sense. You know, we're not we're not really tapping because one of the the lamentations I hear echoed more and more and more, people don't just don't know what to believe anymore. Especially with artificial intelligence and and all the ways that information and even visuals and deep fakes and things can be replicated, like, people really don't know what to believe or how to believe because they're still in the doubt space.

Näthan:

There's their their whole world existence is dubious. So how are you going to have confidence in in how you're perceiving reality if you haven't even taken the critical step of stepping back from your lens and seeing the software?

Ashok:

This is huge, Nava. The great the great philosophers know when you say this is the doubt monster here. The doubt monster can control the space and say, look at what I've got here. This isn't that amazing. You know, to attempt and at least you see you just say yes to hack you.

Ashok:

Right? So why is this ungrounded? But here's the ground. What do you mean? Here's where you have self evident truth.

Ashok:

It's not evident to me. What is what is evidence? What I take to be proof and evidence to support a belief. And if I believe something, I I I and why is it true for me? It's true for me.

Ashok:

Why? Because I believe it with my will. I vote on it. I I believe it. This is my lord.

Ashok:

Right? Or this is my, this is my party, or this is my vote, or this is my belief. That's something your will is is doing. And if you haven't and the doubt monster, because of separation from the thinker, from the content, the information that you're buying into and the or is is capturing you, buying and selling and trading and information. And what can social media present and flood the zone with all kinds of narrative so much so that the the the thinker, the person is so confused in her mind and his mind and the will is so overrun.

Ashok:

And since you're not grounded, you're in a in in dupe you're credulous. You're you're hackable. You you don't know. So you're gonna say, yes. I I believe this.

Ashok:

And you could easily follow what's called a conspiracy theory, but all the theories, all the narratives that you're believing are belief systems is what you're subscribing to. You subscribe to a a narrative, and you can subscribe to many at the same time. In my religious life, I subscribe to subscribe to the bible narrative with the with my whole community. As a scientist, I subscribe to my physics or my my my my biology or or computer science. As a citizen, I subscribe to my acumenical political life where I keep my religion out of my politics.

Ashok:

You know? As someone doing yoga, I subscribe to the yoga I'm practicing and so forth.

Näthan:

Mhmm. And you

Ashok:

don't realize when you have all of these different belief systems going and you don't have a way to sort it out, you're a mush because the you that's biblical and the you that's silent and the you that's in yoga and the you that's crossing words is different versions of you. You can be fragmented. And then the doubt monster owns you.

Näthan:

Yeah.

Ashok:

That's what they caught for because that's what saw. That even mathematics, 2 plus 2 is 4. Right? He said, what if this a demon force, a negative force, which is that's grabbing my eye to make it look true. It must be true or it's not.

Ashok:

And therefore, he realized it was just my opinion. And then he stepped into the I am piece and I'm stepping back. And his meditation is on first philosophy. He was looking for the universal grammar of what is first. He had a dream.

Ashok:

I'm gonna get there. Great mathematician and philosopher, a logician. So he's I'm stepping back from my culture, my belief system, my psychology, my mind, my body, the world, nature, and then he found use. I am without any information. Wow.

Ashok:

And that's where his meditation took off to discover that he's with the logos. Infinite being is holding him. And he says, I'm staying here. Right? So when you're in this space, I when the eye is here and connecting with the other.

Ashok:

It's not like here where the eye is subject, and that's the object, and that's an object that that that's objectified. The information Yeah.

Näthan:

Yeah.

Ashok:

Is objectified.

Näthan:

Yeah.

Ashok:

So where does that take us in terms of breaking the trans now? If people are labored under a powerful software that's grabbed our will and our life Mhmm. And the chaos if there's chaos, you can't focus. What is yoga? Focus.

Ashok:

What is mindfulness? Zen. Be in the zone. Right? All of these metaphors of mindfulness rather than thoughtless.

Ashok:

This form of thinking is not deep thinking, not thoughtful. And that's where the freedom is, and if you realize, wow, I'm in captivity. You can't end slavery here. You have to end it here. Mhmm.

Ashok:

If there's Marty Solomon, you've got to end the mental slavery. If our minds are captive and our wills are under, then we're not with free will. And what do we value more than anything? Freedom. I'm a free being.

Ashok:

If I'm if I'm captive, I wanna be free range. I wanna be free. How do you have to enter the sacred space? How do you do that? The right of passage, mind your mind and become a critical thinker.

Ashok:

Right? Step back.

Näthan:

Yeah. And that's not something you snap your fingers and it's done. You know? It's some it's a it's a, it's something you commit to from now on to to be to I use the word lensativity without really introducing the pun, obviously, a sensitivity to your lens, to step back from your lens, to know that you have a lens and that that lens is not infallible, the way we act like it's infallible, and to get to begin to practice lensativity, it might be really scary at sometimes. I know a lot of people who the idea of being wrong is scarier than death to them.

Näthan:

It was, it would see sure seems like it. You know? Because I

Ashok:

mean, your story could be wrong, you know, and you've gone into and you live your whole life here or the multiple narratives you're living. Here's the lens. What do you mean? The lens is you're playing a role in what you buy into and what appears to you. If you have a biblical lens, you can see the biblical story.

Ashok:

If you have a physics lens, you got physics. And you may have a physic. I'm a physicist scientist. I don't buy the biblical. Cancel that.

Ashok:

Right? So when you get lentivity, you realize what you're buying into using your will to say yes or no and believing. A belief is an act of the will to a reason, such as it is here to subscribe to my belief system and where I live my life. This is my truth. This is my, meaning of my life, and I'm living it here.

Ashok:

Yes.

Näthan:

And there

Ashok:

can be alternative stories. But if I'm not aware that my lens and my will is interpreting it, that's what lens is. We tend to think of it. Here's nature. It's coming out.

Ashok:

It's a fact. It's a. These are facts as if we don't have no. We we render the facts. We make the fact.

Ashok:

We we we pair we play a role in subscribing to the facticity of the fact. And what what would be a fact in one belief system need not and often is not a fact in the other.

Näthan:

Yeah. Yeah.

Ashok:

You you see what I mean? And so where do we get the truth? Is there any truth on that? We hold these truths to be self evident, not self evident to to this mind because there's no this almost helps. You can see now this is a mess.

Ashok:

Right? If I think it's self if this is a truth, you know, life, liberty, and poverty, I buy it. It's evident to me. It's self not so self evident. We if you say yes, what's your evidence?

Ashok:

Why what's your what's your foundation and ground for that belief? Right? But when you're here, you see into the the the light of reason, or what you see reveals itself as true. It's not it it commands your will in its truth ports. That's powerful truth.

Ashok:

Not truth here, which is gonna vary from narrative to narrative. Mhmm. But people don't see the difference. I say, this this is my truth. This is my absolute.

Ashok:

This is what this is my lord. This is my science. This is my medicine. This is my vote, whatever it is. So, Nava, I think this got messy rather quickly, and I'm sorry for that.

Ashok:

You know? But I was just like to elaborate your point about sensitivity. Yeah. It's it's lens activity requires us to step back, wow. My my my my orientation of my mind, my lens, my belief system was already I was playing a role in this narrative.

Ashok:

It's appearing to me. And if I change my lens, I change my narrative. And if I'm objectifying my lover over the work of art and treating it as an object, I'm not meeting her. I'm not meeting him. I'm not meeting the work I'm not meeting nature.

Ashok:

I'm meeting right? But here, it's intimate connection in the flow of, the unifying force with diversity. There's diversity, but, in the diversity. This is where you can get married. This is where you have love.

Ashok:

This is the Valentine's. Here are the object. And if we're raising our children in objectified space, we're facing the other as an object, then something profound is wrong in this objectification of self and other. Mhmm. And when we see that, it's going to be the news, that news, this news.

Ashok:

It is going to jolt this this, you know, sleeping or being hacked. If you realize I'm being hacked by software that I didn't realize it, and it's shaping all the details of my life and my many narratives and my psychological confusion, my existential nihilism, skepticism, and all of the disorders of of existence by being cut off in the flow of the zone. When people see that, they can say, I I wanna get out of here. I need a life raft to to cross. Right?

Näthan:

Well, we're already coming up on our on our end time.

Ashok:

But I just started. Read it when it starts.

Näthan:

Attention incompetence disorder. Single bracket attention

Ashok:

is We need we need attention can be a disorder.

Näthan:

Yeah.

Ashok:

Right? Rather than this form of mindful attention, awakened reason, critical, thinking, freedom, life, liberty, well-being, everything's at stake. This is ill being. Mhmm. Why?

Ashok:

Because it's not all for being, which is what the infinite flow of the infinite source, which is being the infinite word. We're using the word logos, but whatever your favorite name, if you wanna use Yahweh or Allah or Brahman or Ta or Om or Buddha nature, but the infinite, it can be scattered because the infinite can be shattered. So all of them are meeting here. This is a common ground of the infinite source of reason, of a light of reasons, global space. It's sacred space, and we're migrating from here to there.

Ashok:

Now that that's another episode we can follow about a citizen here is not pre citizenship because a citizen is is one who can take an oath to the light of reason. We're officers of logos. We're logos kids, not Lego kids. And once that is exposed and brought out with a hologram. Right?

Ashok:

What is our deepest longing to become a whole person, to be intimate, to find love, to find ethics, nature, sacredness? Everything important is a is in this transition. And our great teachings and scriptures have been calling us to become aware and let us go and rise into our our true being, our true nature as first persons, not derivative. Everything's at stake now. And so, one one of the future, maybe number 5 or number 6 is if we're hacked already, then it's not a matter of just hacking the voting machines.

Ashok:

If you can hack the voter, then you're the voters are gonna click the buttons on the machine. You know? So, you know, if we're hacked and and we're not free beings and free critical thinking, Then what does a citizen hear? And and in the USA example, if we're called right to enter into the dignity and the worth of independence, what is a call of independence? To be independent of any oppressive force that's holding us captive to become a true person and a citizen, one nation under God indivisible, that kind of talk.

Ashok:

The unity and diversity, we can't have it here. Mhmm. But we couldn't see it because we didn't have the wherewithal to understand, wait a minute. Where are we humans in our culture? The human family.

Ashok:

Have we done done our our homework to to examine the software that's shaping everything in our lives and our culture and our experience, our human relations, our politics, our worship, our education, how we raise our children, how we relate to each other. All that's going on here.

Näthan:

Yeah.

Ashok:

I foresee this as am I am I raising a sacred child? Or am I participating in a kind of self abuse and objectification that leads to open self violence?

Näthan:

Yeah.

Ashok:

That's a that's these are some topics we need to massage.

Näthan:

We'll see we'll save those that for the after our after we wrap up here so we can but thank you everybody for listening. This is, just the 4th of many episodes to come. And as we've been saying lately to, I offer 1 on 1 sessions for anyone who's interested in diving deep into this on a personal one on one level where I can kind of meet you there. I'll put the link below to my awakening life arts page, and you can you can reach out to me there. But I just wanted to

Näthan:

say I

Ashok:

wanna urge people who are watching who say, wow. Can I get coaching in this? Nothing is brilliant. He's a great established master yoga teacher. Seeing that yoga is not here.

Ashok:

It's here. The different teachings and popular culture of self help and coaching and all of that. If it's not facing this as a first order of business, saying, folks, let's pay attention to the software in which you and if they're speaking into here and not bringing this up, then it's already, self, defacing. Anyway, Nathan knows how to do this. And if you find out or sign up with him, and I urge you to take that seriously, you can have small group or individual coaching.

Ashok:

I can help you to gain this code shift from this code to source code and code education to become aware of your code and the consequences of it and the code effects of being here and the importance of well-being and enter into the life code of source, which are great wisdom teachings across the planet and scriptures are urging us to go here, leave this, put this first. That's who we are. So I urge you to sign up with, I'm doing a commercial now.

Näthan:

Alright, you guys. Thank you so much for tuning in, and we will see you next week.

Ashok:

Everyone, please join us again, and then share this with your friends. It's very, very important. Now you hear of action. Right? This is huge.

Ashok:

This is based upon the wisdom and scriptures and, enlightenment teachings of the ages, all converging in the infinite source. And this is SourceCast. We try to have media here, not here. That's the SourceCast. Thank you so much for joining us.

Näthan:

Thank you.

Näthan:

Were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who were who

Näthan:

were who were who were who

((A.D.D.)) ~ ((Attention Disorientation Disorder))
Broadcast by